|
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsDigital Divide Exists With Physician EHR AdoptionDSM-4 Task Force Chairman Advises Caution With DSM-5Latest Edition of Psychiatry's 'Bible' Launched Amid ControversyMost Americans Say 'No' to Smoking in Their Homes, CarsCognitive Health Info From Doctors Found to Be Lacking'Nonsmoking' Hotel Rooms May Not Fully Protect GuestsUser Satisfaction With Electronic Health Records DownLook for New, Improved Sunscreen LabelsApplication for Health Coverage Has Been Simplified, ShortenedHospital Bills Can Vary Widely, Even in Same CitiesMoney Motivates Weight Loss -- One Step at a TimeFDA Proposes Tougher Warnings for Tanning BedsPotentially Toxic Metals Present in Lip CosmeticsPatients Most Annoyed by Long Waits, Unclear Test ResultsWhite House to Challenge Ruling on Unlimited Access to 'Morning-After' PillLipsticks, Glosses Contain Toxic Metals: ReportFDA Concerned Caffeinated Foods Could Harm ChildrenRenewed Efforts From AAFP to Repeal OTC Provision in ACAFDA Announces New Network to Focus Exclusively on PatientsPrescription Drug Take-Back Day Set for SaturdayHealth Insurance Shortfalls Hit Nearly Half of U.S. Adults: ReportAlmost Half of Americans Would Consider Donating Kidney to Stranger: PollPhysicians Less Empathetic in Talking to Heavy PatientsMost Americans Oppose Soda, Candy TaxesDiagnostic Errors Are the Leading Type of Malpractice ClaimAmerican Lung Association Stresses Clean Air Act BenefitsHospitalization OK for Psych Patients Can Take HoursU.S. Shortfall in Neurologists Expected to Get WorseUSPSTF: Primary Care Screening Can Help ID Suicide RiskU.S. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to New Cigarette LabelingPatient-Centered Decision Making Ups Health OutcomesGuidelines Issued Relating to Online Medical ProfessionalismAlzheimer's Patients May Face Looming Shortage of NeurologistsClinical Trials Helped One Woman's Fight Against CancerSmoking Bans in Public Housing Could Save Dollars, Lives: CDCDoctors Order Fewer Lab Tests When They Know the CostDoctors' Insight Into Patients' Lives May Boost Care, Study FindsFDA Warns Against Sale of Sports Supplements in U.S.Most ED Docs, Nurses Doubtful About Suicide PreventabilityDoctors Urged to Refrain from Social Media Contacts With PatientsStrides Made in Preventing Cancer, But Challenges Remain: ReportDrug Company Reps Don't Tell Docs Enough About Side Effects: SurveyHospitals Work to Reduce Unnecessary Early BirthsMany Americans Skipping Meds to Save Money, CDC SaysFederal Judge Rules FDA Must Lift Restrictions on Plan BMental Health Care Lacking for Kids, Advocates SayMental Illness a Frequent Cell Mate for Those Behind BarsFed Gov to Cover 100% of New Medicaid Enrollees Under ACAObama Administration Unveils The BRAIN InitiativeRural Hospital Mortality Rates Climbed From 2002-2010 Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by Stephen Blumenthal and Tony Lavender Jessica Kingsley, 2001 Review by Colin A. Holmes on Feb 6th 2003 
On the positive
side, this book packs a huge amount into its 180 pages, and there is no obvious
alternative text. It is essentially an academic literature review, written in a
style that balances factuality with readability, it has text boxes which list
key points, includes a glossary of terms, and is so copiously referenced that
the list amounts to 43 pages!
That said, the
weaknesses of the text are obvious. It shows little sign of the critical
intention embodied in the books title, and there is a tendency to catalogue
series of empirical studies without drawing any conclusions. Readers are mostly
left to judge for themselves the limitations and rigour of the myriad empirical
studies cited, on the basis of the information provided. The differences
between groups of research subjects, and the definitional boundaries within
which they were formed, are largely ignored, and so studies from Scandinavian
countries, England, Scotland, Canada and the United States are juxtaposed
without concern for the radically different jurisdictional, administrative,
professional and clinical systems in which they were conducted.
The books
structure makes it difficult to find answers to the kinds of questions that
arise for clinicians, such as whether a person with schizophrenia becomes less
likely to engage in violent acts as they get older. The answer may be somewhere
in this text, but it is difficult to know where. The brevity of the index is
also unhelpful: the terms gender and women, for example, do not appear in
the index, and yet there is a paragraph on that topic as a predictive factor on
p.43.
A short text on
such complex problems is bound to make many omissions, and so there is no
discussion of violence perpetrated by mentally disordered children and
adolescents, of specific acts of violence such as homicide or parricide, of
specific mental disorders such as schizophrenia, about violence among mentally
disordered women, or about violence within institutions. In the context of
acute, secure and forensic psychiatry these are the kind of topics that are
likely to have clinicians reaching for this text.
Despite claims
that the review is wide-ranging, the authors have drawn almost exclusively
from the clinical psychiatry and psychology literature, and have overlooked
some important resources emanating from other disciplines. This is unfortunate
because those from nursing in particular are concerned with the practicalities
of assessing and working with violent individuals. Following on from this, a
mere seven pages are devoted to describing violence prediction tools, and these
are the already familiar HCR-20, VRAG and MacArthur Risk Assessment Study.
Furthermore, the coverage is introductory, and I easily found more detailed
information free of charge on the Internet. Indeed, the authors have entirely
ignored the Internet as a resource, both for their text, and for clinicians.
This is unfortunate because the Internet is increasingly likely to be the first
port of call for practitioners and academics alike, and some advice on
accessing and utilizing relevant sites would have been helpful.
The concluding
discussion of the clinician-patient relationship and the management of violence
in a health care or correctional setting is disappointingly brief. It relies
heavily on John Gunns chapter on dangerousness from the Gunn & Taylor text
of 1993 and has little to say about managing violence in an institutional
setting. In terms of drawing out practice implications from the evidence they
have reviewed, Blumenthal and Lavender stay at a safe distance from the sharp
end, restricting their comments to social, attitudinal and policy issues. The
authors assert several times in the course of the text that The mentally ill
make a small contribution to the overall levels of violence in society
(p.127). While such comments reflect political sensitivity, they are of little
help to clinicians who work day-after-day with mentally disordered clients and
face the challenge of assessing and managing violence as a matter of routine.
For a practical
guide to assessing and managing violence, readers will need to look elsewhere,
perhaps beginning with Assessment and
Clinical Management of Risk of Harm to Other People. (London: Royal College
of Psychiatrists, 1996), which is not mentioned by Blumenthal and Lavender.
Mostly, they will need to go to the journal literature and the materials
available on the Internet (via the Canadian Corrections pages, or Phil Woods
Forensic Nursing page, for example). Alternative texts are few indeed, and
Blumenthal and Lavender have brought together a mass of hitherto disparate
evidence, which provides a useful starting point for mental health
professionals, and students of psychology and psychiatry, trying to understand
the links between violence and mental disorder. Despite my criticisms, I will
be ordering a copy for the university library!
© Colin A. Holmes
Dr Colin A Holmes, Professor of
Nursing (Mental Health), James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland,
Australia
|